Around Hawaii
Road Runner MailOceanic

Wednesday, November 4, 2009

Google
 

Lifestyle :: Health/Fitness :: Speed Training :: Sadlowski Footwork for Longer Drives

Sadlowski Footwork for Longer Drives

***** Based on 3 member reviews
HELP ME WITH RATINGS
Since I’m old, I can remember pictures of Jack Nicklaus in the mid 1970’s hitting the ball with a perfectly flat left foot at impact (he rolled his feet over post-impact). Then we saw Greg Norman with his feet moving all over the place. I took that as an abnormality and dismissed it. Nick Faldo came along and had a nice, quiet foot at impact (perhaps indication of the WUT swing?). Then Tiger comes along and we saw feet moving again. So it got me to thinking, what’s going on?

Are we supposed to have quiet, stable looking feet at impact, or not?

From the aspect of physics, “more planted” could mean greater ground reaction force. But on the other hand, perhaps the ground force could have been generated before impact. Hmmmmm.

My belief is that the feet and legs should be dynamic and moving instead of quiet but there is a method to the madness. Long Drive Champion Jamie Sadlowski surely has the right type of movement in his feet. He’s swinging at close to 155 miles per hour and is producing more force (and higher RFD) than someone swinging at 125 mph. Tiger has similar moves though not nearly as forceful since accuracy is very important on the tour.

Granted we may be talking apples and oranges here because Long Drive Competitions are not PGA tour events where accuracy and short game are important but there are things we can learn from both of these champions so that we can ultimately improve our game.  

Let’s start by taking a deeper look into the footwork of Jamie.

Foot Plant

As discussed in previous articles, the closed hip slide occurs during transition. Jamie and Tiger both have a closed left heel slide that coincides with this hip slide. As you can imagine, this is all part of the symphony (or rock concert) of their swings.


Notice the left heel has slid forward towards the target. This is more an indication of the lower body shift forward. Many amateurs make the opposite move by sliding the left heel back away from the target during transition or at the start of the downswing. This shows the spinout move typical of a slicer.

If there is one killer move, that would be it. If the left heel slides back during transition, it will prematurely open the hips without any weight transfer or slide. In turn this will force the shoulders to open too early as well. But the main problem with this move would be that it would effectively ruin any chance to fire the body again before impact. The arms would be the only body part capable of moving.

Fire!

After the foot plant is complete, there is little time to waste. The legs and hips must fire immediately thereafter. The left leg begins to jump up (Multiple Firing Theory swing) and rotate the left hip back (away from the target) and up. The resulting foot movement will be quite different than what you would imagine a correct move to be. But this is not a beauty contest or a ballroom dance. It’s all about speed and power in a golf swing.

  • Notice how his left foot is floating on the outside edge of the shoe. This is the result of “un-weighting” his left leg in order to spin faster.
  • His left heel has spun back towards his right foot.
  • Toes have spun to point more towards the target.
From the back view we can see some additional moves:

  • Inverse movement of right and left foot -- as left foot drops, right foot lifts.
  • Right leg and foot haven’t fired yet; they are just getting into position very quickly
  • When the real firing starts, a drastic change appears in right calf muscles
I can just hear it now. “Oh, but that looks so violent and unstable. Maybe we shouldn’t be copying these long drive guys because we still have to hit it straight.”

Okay, so in contrast, here’s epitome of gracefulness and beauty in a golf swing: Ernie Els.


His feet have the same movements at Jamie albeit with just a little less speed and power. The same could be said for Tiger but then again Jamie does hit it about 100 yards farther than the PGA tour guys.

These are Ernie’s foot movements.  Can you see any similarities to Jamie’s?
  • Heel slide towards target at foot plant.
  • Left foot is floating on the outside edge of the shoe. This happens just a little later than Jamie’s though.
  • His left heel has spun back towards his right foot.
  • Toes have spun to point more towards the target.
There are two key points to note about this footwork. First, the slight left heel slide towards the target “blocks” the lower body from spinning too early and allows for proper transfer of weight. And secondly, the spin on the outside edge of the shoe facilitates a faster spin and greater range of rotational motion than any “planted” or “stable” left foot could ever provide.

Whip ‘Um Theory Footwork

Former #2 player in the world Phil Mickelson has been blindsided by the WUT theory swing. Having trust and faith in one’s instructor can be good but sometimes you have to wonder what could have been…………..

He’s probably one of the most talented guys on tour but he’s got very little dynamics in his lower body. The lack of lower body dynamics limits the length of his drives and keeps him from going for more on those occasions he needs it. This was so apparent in the FBR Open playoff earlier this year against JB Holmes. Phil decided to lay up short of a water hazard 300 yards away while JB ripped his driver and carried the hazard with a 360-yard drive. JB made birdie with a SW to the green and won the tournament.

The problem plaguing Phil is that his hands and upper body have been trained to be the primary power producers. Therefore, when swinging faster or harder than normal, it is unknown whether or not his lower body will fire fast. His athletic instincts would be to fire his lower body hard and fast but years of detraining causes him to slow it down. It’s a roll of the dice under that kind of pressure.
 
This obviously will cause timing problems for his hands and lead to some of the direction problems he’s had under pressure i.e. 2006 US Open 18th hole at Winged Foot CC where he hit deep into the trees and almost went OB on his way to a double bogey.

Thus, in this situation, he chooses to stay in control and lay up with the three-wood. This method wins some of the time but it seems to me that the writing is on the wall. Tiger, Sergio, JB, Padraig, Angel, Camillo, AK and the rest of the bombers will take over the tour. Let’s hope Butch can help him get on track.

But I digress. Let’s get back to the analysis to see how this different type of swing shows up in a different pattern of footwork and leg movements.


Notice these little things.
  • No transition
  • No fall in
  • Late squat position
  • Flat-footed at impact (both feet)
  • Late back knee kick in (are legs just tagging along for the ride?)
  • Extra slide forward through impact with the lead knee (no jump)
  • No “glute” firing
Interesting isn’t it? Is he stuck in a time warp? It’s like he’s going in slow motion compared to Jamie.

If you become so anchored or planted to the ground with your footwork, you’ll swing like a palm tree in the wind -- the top moves but the closer it gets toward the bottom, not much moves. More importantly, the largest, most powerful muscles are in the lower body. So why not use them?

Contrast that with Jamie’s footwork. It’s like the whole palm tree being twisted and spun out of the ground by a whirling tornado. This is how your feet MUST work in order to facilitate high speed, high-energy body dynamics.

There is more to be explored with the MFT swing. Next month, we will investigate the new discovery of what I’m calling the “Chi line.” This is really how the long hitters use physics and Eastern philosophy energy centers (whether or not they realize it) to maximize their trunk rotational speed at impact.

The views and information contained are not provided or endorsed by Oceanic Time Warner Cable or any its affiliates. The content provided is for general information and entertainment purposes only. Please seek professional advice before acting on any information contained within this web site. Any unauthorized reproduction is prohibited.

Comments

User Graphic
vision54 — Thursday, January 1, 2009
reportreply
Terrific article K...always exploring and exploding old myths... My question : is there a way to break the habit of a firm and stationary left foot...I have always worked to keep my left foot flat, disallowing my left heel to lift. JS moves his feet...my guess is that his movements are natural and not something he works on...but if I want to develop similiar foot movement.. is their a way to learn that, or is it as simple as allowing your left heel to move? Once again...a great article.. Happy New Year Peter


User Graphic
kmiyahira — Thursday, January 1, 2009
reportreply
Sorry, somehow Phil's animation got flip flopped to right handed. I had a scratch player come for a lesson the other week and he was stuck in the WUT swing. Just by working on the jump/twist 2nd fire, he developed this footwork without me saying anything about it. He just athletically did it. So it's about knowing that you must "unweight" the front foot to move it as well as understanding the feet should not be anchors. Might even save an ACL by doing so. Happy New Year too... K


User Graphic
vision54 — Thursday, January 1, 2009
reportreply
Thanks K... might have saved Tiger's ACL.... P


User Graphic
vision54 — Thursday, January 1, 2009
reportreply
Hi K... Is the new hip/shoulder/2nd fire trainer similiar to the speed chain? P


User Graphic
kmiyahira — Thursday, January 1, 2009
reportreply
Peter...Tiger had more violent foot movement earlier in his career. Now it's a little more calmed down, though it still moves. But you could be right. Quiet feet and violent body = injury. And the new trainer uses a chain but is going to help train the 2nd fire more.....K


User Graphic
vision54 — Thursday, January 1, 2009
reportreply
...so you re taking on all the heavyweights:) like Jim McClain whose X-factor mandates the solid footing to enable torque....revolutionary to say the least ....i have studied many different teachers, all whom teach variations on the same swing style..but in truth..I never experienced any significant difference until I measured the jump and twist on the chi line against the smash factor....this was the only time there was an actual measurable difference.... P


User Graphic
kmiyahira — Thursday, January 1, 2009
reportreply
P, I've got a friend that says, "if sex instruction were as poor as golf instruction, the human race would have been extinct long ago." But seriously, there's never been a Tiger before (actually Jack was in the early '60's) and there certainly wasn't anyone swinging like Jamie before so we're entering exciting times. But how many years will it take before teachers figure this out? Ten years? More? Let's get to it now and stop limiting the progress of the students. Kelvin


User Graphic
jymetalwood — Friday, January 2, 2009
reportreply
Kelvin: Your articles are so enlightning, I only wish I was fifty years younger. Your assessments are so thought provoking. Please keep up the great work, I look forward to each new article. Joe Yablonski PS, I wish I was there with you now, too much snow on the mainland.


User Graphic
kmiyahira — Friday, January 2, 2009
reportreply
Thanks Joe! Sorry about the Pineapple Express sending you the snow. We're getting a lot of rain here....Kelvin


User Graphic
vision54 — Sunday, January 4, 2009
reportreply
i K...went to golfsmith yesterdy....what happens in a golf swing to explain different smash factor readings?. It seemed as though I would stay on the chi line, twist and jump, relaxed my left foot etc...I found that there were times when my reading was 5.5 but times when it was 3.6.....distance seemed to be around the same...and I wasn't particularly aware of anything different in my swing that might account for the different readings. If all things are equal what do you think is the main reason for a 3-6 or a 5.5 smash factor. Also ....are there principles that you have written about regarding the full swing that apply to putting or has most everything been already written on the subject. Peter


User Graphic
kmiyahira — Sunday, January 4, 2009
reportreply
Peter, besides the obvious center of the face contact, I believe there is a possibility of adding your body's effective mass to the impact of the ball. By timing your body speeds to coincide with impact definitely helps vs. slowing things down. Logical to me. K


User Graphic
vision54 — Monday, January 5, 2009
reportreply
yes...that makes perfect sense...thanks P


User Graphic
mship — Tuesday, January 6, 2009
reportreply
Kel - do you feel that picking up the left foot is necessary? can't the same can be accomplished by just rolling the left foot? Also it looks as though JS picking up the right foot allows him to firmly post on that left leg and use the ball of the right foot as a pivot point for the turn left and by the time the left heel rotates back the ball and force is gone looks to me that this is just necessary b/c if the foot stayed planted he would tear his knee to shreds...just my thoughts... Also agree your articles are awesome!


User Graphic
kmiyahira — Tuesday, January 6, 2009
reportreply
Mike, more important than what the foot does is what his head is doing because it reveals his center of mass rising on the backswing, then falling during transition. So if you can do the same with the left foot rolling, that's fine. As to your assessment of his right foot, yes, he is doing some distinct movements. You can clearly see how he sets the position, then fires after it's free to move. I agree, he'd tear up the knees without the movement.


User Graphic
vision54 — Tuesday, January 6, 2009
reportreply
Hi K.....i was looking at tiger and hogan..trying to watch if they raised up at all on the backswing and if they stayed on the chi line...well it didn't appear they moved up at all but both seemed on the line with driver and irons....you mention JS moves up on the backswing and then down with a jump and twist...is that move particular to him? and how important is the rise on the backswing? P


User Graphic
kmiyahira — Tuesday, January 6, 2009
reportreply
Peter, maybe it is more important that you can stay level or rise up, but one killer move would be to dip down on the backswing. It would ruin most player's chance to get any sequencing down. K


User Graphic
vision54 — Wednesday, January 7, 2009
reportreply
Thanks K...that is great information...as I was tending to move somewhat down on the backswing, thinkin that it was more like a javalin thrower...I forget the author's name but it was the protegee of Mike Austin...and in his bok he emphasized to straighten the back leg on the backswing which effectively raises the body... Thanks for your insight P


User Graphic
kmiyahira — Wednesday, January 7, 2009
reportreply
Peter....It sometimes helps to understand the swing as a series of stretch shorten cycles. What does JS do on the backswing by rising up? It's stretching the erector spinae, those long muscles running up and down both sides of your spine. Then the erectors can fire back to power the downswing. Part of an upcoming article on the spine engine so there's more to this.


User Graphic
vision54 — Saturday, January 10, 2009
reportreply
Hi K... thanks so much for that description..i never thought about the swing in terms of stretch-shorten movement....regarding the irons...i'm trying to get a picture/feeling of the downswing...by moving up slightly on takeaway and then down with a twist-jump...with the closed hip, move the tailbone with a slight shift.... but how far does the head slide?...does it stay on or inside the chi line? and does that feel like the head is really staying in the same position? Thanks P


User Graphic
kmiyahira — Saturday, January 10, 2009
reportreply
Peter....this is going to sound odd but you know how they always say hit your driver like your 9-iron? That's Opposite World. How about you think of hitting your irons like you hit your driver? How else can Tiger hit a 6-iron from a fairway bunker over water 210 yards away? As to head, it may move forward during transition but as soon as you 2nd fire, your head should actually fall backwards as you see in Jamie's swing. It's the same as a hammer throw. So Jamie and Tiger will have their heads slightly behind the chi line. Hope that answers your questions. K


User Graphic
vision54 — Saturday, January 10, 2009
reportreply
Thanks K...as usual...your perspective is totally New World.....who thinks about hitting a 9-iron like a driver...so cool... can't wait for the speed chain P


User Graphic
vision54 — Sunday, January 11, 2009
reportreply
Hi K... just wondering whether the chi line has any significance with chipping and putting or do most of your fundamentals primarily apply to the full swing. P


User Graphic
kmiyahira — Sunday, January 11, 2009
reportreply
Great question Peter...the WUT swing is great for accuracy. So it makes for great 3/4 shots and other pitches where distance isn't important but accuracy is. We shouldn't use the MFT power swing for the short shots..K


User Graphic
Tom — Wednesday, January 14, 2009
reportreply
"Are we supposed to have quiet, stable looking feet at impact, or not?"........... No. You must strive for stability of center of the top of the spine, through mobility, locomotion, of the of the tibia and fibula, they move the COG chi. The feet passivly leverage against the ground.


User Graphic
kmiyahira — Wednesday, January 14, 2009
reportreply
Sounds good, our readers will have to wait till next month's article to understand what you're saying. K



Add Your Own Comment

Please be short and to the point, and respect the other voices in the discussion. You may edit and delete comments for up to three days after date of post. We reserve the right to edit or delete inappropriate comments. For more information read our site policies »

In order to comment, you must be logged in. Login | Register

Help me with comments

20080401_AHTravel




Send This Person a Message


Email Article to a Friend


Become a Columnist
Are you an expert in your own field? Do you know somebody who is? Fill out our online form and tell us about it. We'll select and consider those who fit the bill!

 Global Right Column - Bottom
Advertisement